Review



positive controls  (Zymo Research)


Bioz Verified Symbol Zymo Research is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Zymo Research manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 99

    Structured Review

    Zymo Research positive controls
    Positive Controls, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 884 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/positive+controls/ZymoBIOMICS+Microbial+Community+Standard/pmc12954305-58-4-10
    Average 99 stars, based on 884 article reviews
    positive controls - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    99/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    94
    MedChemExpress positive control group 316
    Positive Control Group 316, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/positive+controls/Sodium+carboxymethyl+cellulose/pm42567486-151-55-60
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    positive control group 316 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    99
    Zymo Research positive controls
    Positive Controls, supplied by Zymo Research, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/positive+controls/ZymoBIOMICS+Microbial+Community+Standard/pmc12954305-58-4-10
    Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    positive controls - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    99/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Genecopoeia gluc positive control clone
    Gluc Positive Control Clone, supplied by Genecopoeia, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/positive+controls/GLuc+positive+control+clone/custom%40gapdh-pg02%4042208106
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gluc positive control clone - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    InvivoGen positive control anti cd20 hlgg1
    Positive Control Anti Cd20 Hlgg1, supplied by InvivoGen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/positive+controls/Anti-hCD20-hIgG1/pm42165222-180-0-3
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    positive control anti cd20 hlgg1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    MedChemExpress control il17a inhibitor
    Clusters of <t>IL17A</t> experimentally validated hits.
    Control Il17a Inhibitor, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/positive+controls/LY3509754/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__08__03__742480-847-7-1
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    control il17a inhibitor - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    MedChemExpress control irak4 inhibitor
    Prospective virtual screening campaigns were conducted against four therapeutically relevant targets representing distinct target classes and binding-site architectures. CD73 (nucleotidase), <t>IRAK4</t> (kinase), and Factor XI (FXIa protease) were targeted through orthosteric inhibition, whereas IL-17A, a protein–protein interaction (PPI) target, was targeted through an allosteric binding site. For each target, the experimentally determined hit rate, a representative validated hit, its biochemical potency ( IC 50), and its structural similarity to the closest previously reported inhibitor (ECFP4 Tanimoto coefficient) are shown. The prospective campaigns identified 56 active compounds from 183 tested for CD73, 19 from 127 for IRAK4, 13 from 299 for Factor XI, and 6 from 194 for IL-17A. Across all four targets, representative hits exhibited low structural similarity to known inhibitors (ECFP4 Tanimoto coefficients of 0.22–0.27), demonstrating the ability of the virtual screening workflow to prospectively identify chemically novel scaffolds across both conventional orthosteric targets and more challenging protein–protein interaction targets.
    Control Irak4 Inhibitor, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/positive+controls/IRAK4%2C+Human/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__08__03__742480-783-7-1
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    control irak4 inhibitor - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Agrisera rubisco positive control
    Prospective virtual screening campaigns were conducted against four therapeutically relevant targets representing distinct target classes and binding-site architectures. CD73 (nucleotidase), <t>IRAK4</t> (kinase), and Factor XI (FXIa protease) were targeted through orthosteric inhibition, whereas IL-17A, a protein–protein interaction (PPI) target, was targeted through an allosteric binding site. For each target, the experimentally determined hit rate, a representative validated hit, its biochemical potency ( IC 50), and its structural similarity to the closest previously reported inhibitor (ECFP4 Tanimoto coefficient) are shown. The prospective campaigns identified 56 active compounds from 183 tested for CD73, 19 from 127 for IRAK4, 13 from 299 for Factor XI, and 6 from 194 for IL-17A. Across all four targets, representative hits exhibited low structural similarity to known inhibitors (ECFP4 Tanimoto coefficients of 0.22–0.27), demonstrating the ability of the virtual screening workflow to prospectively identify chemically novel scaffolds across both conventional orthosteric targets and more challenging protein–protein interaction targets.
    Rubisco Positive Control, supplied by Agrisera, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/positive+controls/control+positive+rubisco/pm42296348-325-1-5
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rubisco positive control - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Kemin Industries salinomycin 60 ppm positive control group 2 eimeria tenella infection
    Prospective virtual screening campaigns were conducted against four therapeutically relevant targets representing distinct target classes and binding-site architectures. CD73 (nucleotidase), <t>IRAK4</t> (kinase), and Factor XI (FXIa protease) were targeted through orthosteric inhibition, whereas IL-17A, a protein–protein interaction (PPI) target, was targeted through an allosteric binding site. For each target, the experimentally determined hit rate, a representative validated hit, its biochemical potency ( IC 50), and its structural similarity to the closest previously reported inhibitor (ECFP4 Tanimoto coefficient) are shown. The prospective campaigns identified 56 active compounds from 183 tested for CD73, 19 from 127 for IRAK4, 13 from 299 for Factor XI, and 6 from 194 for IL-17A. Across all four targets, representative hits exhibited low structural similarity to known inhibitors (ECFP4 Tanimoto coefficients of 0.22–0.27), demonstrating the ability of the virtual screening workflow to prospectively identify chemically novel scaffolds across both conventional orthosteric targets and more challenging protein–protein interaction targets.
    Salinomycin 60 Ppm Positive Control Group 2 Eimeria Tenella Infection, supplied by Kemin Industries, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/positive+controls/2+60+control+eimeria+group+infection+positive+ppm+salinomycin+tenella/us12648919-143-31-46
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    salinomycin 60 ppm positive control group 2 eimeria tenella infection - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Shanghai Yuanye Biochemicals positive control group
    Prospective virtual screening campaigns were conducted against four therapeutically relevant targets representing distinct target classes and binding-site architectures. CD73 (nucleotidase), <t>IRAK4</t> (kinase), and Factor XI (FXIa protease) were targeted through orthosteric inhibition, whereas IL-17A, a protein–protein interaction (PPI) target, was targeted through an allosteric binding site. For each target, the experimentally determined hit rate, a representative validated hit, its biochemical potency ( IC 50), and its structural similarity to the closest previously reported inhibitor (ECFP4 Tanimoto coefficient) are shown. The prospective campaigns identified 56 active compounds from 183 tested for CD73, 19 from 127 for IRAK4, 13 from 299 for Factor XI, and 6 from 194 for IL-17A. Across all four targets, representative hits exhibited low structural similarity to known inhibitors (ECFP4 Tanimoto coefficients of 0.22–0.27), demonstrating the ability of the virtual screening workflow to prospectively identify chemically novel scaffolds across both conventional orthosteric targets and more challenging protein–protein interaction targets.
    Positive Control Group, supplied by Shanghai Yuanye Biochemicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/positive+controls/control+group+positive/10__1111_slash_jocd__70969-121-55-63
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    positive control group - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Clusters of IL17A experimentally validated hits.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Overcoming the accuracy–generalization tradeoff in docking and scoring for prospective virtual screening

    doi: 10.64898/2026.08.03.742480

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Clusters of IL17A experimentally validated hits.

    Article Snippet: LY3509754 (MedChemExpress, HY-139206) was used as a positive-control IL17A inhibitor.

    Techniques:

    Prospective virtual screening campaigns were conducted against four therapeutically relevant targets representing distinct target classes and binding-site architectures. CD73 (nucleotidase), IRAK4 (kinase), and Factor XI (FXIa protease) were targeted through orthosteric inhibition, whereas IL-17A, a protein–protein interaction (PPI) target, was targeted through an allosteric binding site. For each target, the experimentally determined hit rate, a representative validated hit, its biochemical potency ( IC 50), and its structural similarity to the closest previously reported inhibitor (ECFP4 Tanimoto coefficient) are shown. The prospective campaigns identified 56 active compounds from 183 tested for CD73, 19 from 127 for IRAK4, 13 from 299 for Factor XI, and 6 from 194 for IL-17A. Across all four targets, representative hits exhibited low structural similarity to known inhibitors (ECFP4 Tanimoto coefficients of 0.22–0.27), demonstrating the ability of the virtual screening workflow to prospectively identify chemically novel scaffolds across both conventional orthosteric targets and more challenging protein–protein interaction targets.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Overcoming the accuracy–generalization tradeoff in docking and scoring for prospective virtual screening

    doi: 10.64898/2026.08.03.742480

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Prospective virtual screening campaigns were conducted against four therapeutically relevant targets representing distinct target classes and binding-site architectures. CD73 (nucleotidase), IRAK4 (kinase), and Factor XI (FXIa protease) were targeted through orthosteric inhibition, whereas IL-17A, a protein–protein interaction (PPI) target, was targeted through an allosteric binding site. For each target, the experimentally determined hit rate, a representative validated hit, its biochemical potency ( IC 50), and its structural similarity to the closest previously reported inhibitor (ECFP4 Tanimoto coefficient) are shown. The prospective campaigns identified 56 active compounds from 183 tested for CD73, 19 from 127 for IRAK4, 13 from 299 for Factor XI, and 6 from 194 for IL-17A. Across all four targets, representative hits exhibited low structural similarity to known inhibitors (ECFP4 Tanimoto coefficients of 0.22–0.27), demonstrating the ability of the virtual screening workflow to prospectively identify chemically novel scaffolds across both conventional orthosteric targets and more challenging protein–protein interaction targets.

    Article Snippet: Zimlovisertib (MedChemExpress, HY-19836) was used as a positive-control IRAK4 inhibitor.

    Techniques: Binding Assay, Inhibition

    (a) Prospective virtual screening workflow. Approximately 80 billion compounds from Enamine REAL Space were computationally screened and progressively prioritized to 153 compounds for procurement, of which 127 were experimentally evaluated. The number of compounds remaining after each filtering stage and the corresponding biochemical and cellular hit rates are shown. (b) Characterization of validated hits. Top, single-concentration biochemical inhibition measured at 100 and 10 μM . Middle, molecular weight (MW) and topological polar surface area (TPSA) distributions of validated hits. Bottom left, UMAP projection of ECFP4 fingerprints comparing validated hits (orange) with previously reported IRAK4 inhibitors (blue). Bottom right, distribution of ECFP4 Tanimoto similarity between validated hits and the closest known IRAK4 inhibitor, illustrating the chemical novelty of the identified compounds. (c) Representative validated IRAK4 inhibitors. Chemical structures, biochemical and cellular IC 50 values, physicochemical properties, and representative dose-response curves for two non-nucleotide inhibitors.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Overcoming the accuracy–generalization tradeoff in docking and scoring for prospective virtual screening

    doi: 10.64898/2026.08.03.742480

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (a) Prospective virtual screening workflow. Approximately 80 billion compounds from Enamine REAL Space were computationally screened and progressively prioritized to 153 compounds for procurement, of which 127 were experimentally evaluated. The number of compounds remaining after each filtering stage and the corresponding biochemical and cellular hit rates are shown. (b) Characterization of validated hits. Top, single-concentration biochemical inhibition measured at 100 and 10 μM . Middle, molecular weight (MW) and topological polar surface area (TPSA) distributions of validated hits. Bottom left, UMAP projection of ECFP4 fingerprints comparing validated hits (orange) with previously reported IRAK4 inhibitors (blue). Bottom right, distribution of ECFP4 Tanimoto similarity between validated hits and the closest known IRAK4 inhibitor, illustrating the chemical novelty of the identified compounds. (c) Representative validated IRAK4 inhibitors. Chemical structures, biochemical and cellular IC 50 values, physicochemical properties, and representative dose-response curves for two non-nucleotide inhibitors.

    Article Snippet: Zimlovisertib (MedChemExpress, HY-19836) was used as a positive-control IRAK4 inhibitor.

    Techniques: Concentration Assay, Inhibition, Molecular Weight